Westside Parkway Project
9 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2002121014
Lead Agency
City of Bakersfield
Document Title
Westside Parkway Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/19/2006
Present Land Use
Transportation
Document Description
The proposed project involves the construction of a new east-west freeway referred to as the Westside Parkway and a concurrent Specific Plan Line Amendment No. 03-1163. The alignment proposed for the Westside Parkway generally comprises the easterly portion of the Cross Valley Canal (CVC) Alignment as described in the Tier 1 Route 58 Route Adoption EIS/EIR. The Westside Parkway is the first transportation facility project within the Route 58 corridor described in that Tier 1 EIS/EIR. The freeway would be approximately 13 km (8.1 miles) long and extend from approximately Health Road to a point near SR-99 at Truxton Avenue in the City of Bakersfield and an unincorporated portion of Kern County. The project also includes the extension of Mohawk Street south from Rosedale Highway, across the Kern River, to Truxton Avenue.
Contact Information
Name
Ted Wright
Agency Name
City of Bakersfield
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Bakersfield
Counties
Kern
Cross Streets
Allen Road, Calloway Drive, Coffee Road, Mohawk Street
Zip
93301
State Highways
SR-99, 58
Railways
BNSF
Schools
Columbia, Liberty, CSUB
Waterways
Kern River, Friant-Kern Canal, Cross Valley Canal
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Bakersfield
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.