East Cypress Corridor Specific Plan (Biggs Subdivision 9156 Development Agreement)
29 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004092011
Lead Agency
City of Oakley
Document Title
East Cypress Corridor Specific Plan (Biggs Subdivision 9156 Development Agreement)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/17/2012
Present Land Use
The present land uses include scattered residential use, irrigated pasture used for cattle grazing, and construction of a new residential development. The existing General Plan land use designations include: agricultural limited; single family high; single family medium; single family low; single family very low; multifamily low; commercial; commercial recreation; parks and recreation; public and semi public. Zoning is single family residential (R-10); single family (R-7); single family (R-6); single family (R-15); single family (R-40); single family (R-20); single family (R-15); single family (D-1); community district (C-B); neighborhood business (N-B); retail business (R-B); general commercial ©; agricultural district; agricultural limited, commercial recreation.
Document Description
Approval of a Development Agreement by and between the City of Oakley and Bethel Island, LLC relating to the project known as Bethel Island LLC, Planning Area 4 of the East Cypress Corridor Specific Plan (also known as Biggs Subdivision 9156). APNs 020-140-007 and 020-150-003
Contact Information
Name
Ken Strelo
Agency Name
City of Oakley
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Oakley
Counties
Contra Costa
Cross Streets
E. Cypress Road / Jersey Island Road
Parcel #
Numerous
State Highways
SR 4
Railways
ATSF
Waterways
San Joaquin River, Dutch Slough, Sand Mound Slough, Rock Slough, Contra Costa Canal
Township
2N
Range
3E
Section
21, 28
Other Information
Section: 27, 22
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Oakley
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.